Zakir Naik humiliates opponents of Islam! Masha’allah!
THIS VIDEO FOLLOWS ALL YOUTUBE RULES AND IS COPYRIGHTED TO MULLAH666. PLEASE ASK ME BEFORE MAKING COPIES. MASHA’ALLAH!
Zakir Abdul Karim Naik (born October 18, 1965) is an Indian public speaker and writer on the subject of Islam and comparative religion. He travels extensively and has been featured at many Islamic conferences.
A medical doctor by training, Naik attempts to clear what he considers misconceptions about Islam, using the Qur’an, Hadith and other religious scriptures as a basis while also spreading Dawah (Islamic proselytism). Naik claims to offer a rational understanding of Islam. Various aspects of Islamic law, Shari’a, he says, may seem illogical to non-Muslims, or non-practicing Muslims; Naik claims these rules are sensible. Islam, in his view, is the best way of life because its teachings constitute practical solutions for the problems of mankind. Critics have claimed that Naik’s views on “Idol worship in Islam” is hypocritical. They have claimed that he deliberately talking only of “standing on idols” and nothing else which could be deemed disrespectful (like spitting or kicking).[16]
Naik’s views on prasad and Christmas wishes have been discussed on Indian television channels. During NDTV’s televised debate “The Big Fight” (March 11 2006) and prominent Indian Muslims such as Salman Khurshid and Javed Akhtar reproved what they felt were Naik’s mischievous attempts to radicalize the Indian Muslim community and promote communal strife.
Other Muslims like Sheikh Taj-Al Halily and the members of the Muslim Canadian Congress have also rejected this viewpoint on Christmas wishes. [17]
Some non-Muslim critics have questioned his claim that the consumption of pork can lead to a person behaving like a pig. [18]
Critics also point to Naik’s strident debating style to claim that he wants to raise communal feelings.[19] During the Bangalore debate, Naik criticised other religions including Hinduism. His co-speaker Sri Sri Ravi Shankar simply replied, “to each their belief, and it is not our position to question them.”[20]
Various published sources, such as the CIA Factbook, contradict Naik’s claims that there are more women than men in groups of marriagable age.[21] Critics say this undercuts his rationale for polygamy.
Ali Sina, who is a big critic of Naik, has claimed that Naik is a showman who twists the truth and fools his audience. He has reviewed the debate between Campbell and Naik and claims that Naik misrepresented Islam with his lies.[22]
In response to questions about Naik, Darul Ifta, an Islamic organization in India which issues advice and fatwas has said that “one should not rely upon his speeches”[23], “his knowledge is not deep”[24] and that”he is deviated from the path of well-versed Ulama”[25]. They also say that Naik is “spreading mischievous things and misguiding simple Muslims to wrong path”[26] and that “he is religiously deviated, some of his talks are unauthentic.” [27] They advise other Muslims that “one is most probably feared to fall in fitnah by listening his speeches.”[28]
Duration : 0:9:52
Read the rest of this entry »